linux-kernel - [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201009135104.39048-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:51:04 -0400
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        <mhocko@...nel.org>, <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
CC:     <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()

The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the
else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess. So we could
replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with else
equally.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 2636f8bad908..f607afd0fcbf 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
 		 * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
 		 * limit by the same amount
 		 */
-		else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
+		else
 			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
 	}
 
-- 
2.19.1