[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201009151227.GP4967@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 17:12:27 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov.dev@...il.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in
__mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()
On Fri 09-10-20 09:51:04, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the
> else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess. So we could
> replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with else
> equally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
I believe this is a result of a very unreadable code. Resp. the comment
makes it hard to follow. It would be slightly better to simply drop the
comment which doesn't really explain much IMHO.
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 2636f8bad908..f607afd0fcbf 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
> * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
> * limit by the same amount
> */
> - else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
> + else
> p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> }
>
> --
> 2.19.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists