lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201011144025.GB15925@zn.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 11 Oct 2020 16:40:25 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: objtool/core] x86/insn: Support big endian cross-compiles

On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> Should I resent the entire patch series again with these changes
> squashed? Or just as a separate commit which would go on top?

You can wait at least a week (merge window starts tomorrow) and then
resend the entire series once the final approach is agreed upon.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ