[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201012151816.GA1559916@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:18:16 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-safety@...ts.elisa.tech,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-sched: add comment about
find_tt() not returning error
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> And for the static analysis finding, we need to find a way to ignore this
> finding without simply ignoring all findings or new findings that just
> look very similar to the original finding, but which are valid.
Then I suggest you fix the tool that "flagged" this, surely this is not
the only thing it detected with a test like this, right?
What tool reported this?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists