[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <V533IQ.G4C1EIUTGQYU3@crapouillou.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:15:31 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
Hi Stephen,
Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 à 15:24, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>> <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13,
>> from drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:10:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c: In function
>> 'ingenic_drm_update_palette':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:448:35: error: 'struct
>> ingenic_drm' has no member named 'dma_hwdescs'; did you mean
>> 'dma_hwdesc_f0'?
>> 448 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette);
>> i++) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/kernel.h:47:33: note: in definition of macro
>> 'ARRAY_SIZE'
>> 47 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) +
>> __must_be_array(arr))
>> | ^~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:448:35: error: 'struct
>> ingenic_drm' has no member named 'dma_hwdescs'; did you mean
>> 'dma_hwdesc_f0'?
>> 448 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette);
>> i++) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/kernel.h:47:48: note: in definition of macro
>> 'ARRAY_SIZE'
>> 47 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) +
>> __must_be_array(arr))
>> | ^~~
>> In file included from include/linux/bits.h:22,
>> from include/linux/bitops.h:5,
>> from drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm.h:10,
>> from drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:7:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:448:35: error: 'struct
>> ingenic_drm' has no member named 'dma_hwdescs'; did you mean
>> 'dma_hwdesc_f0'?
>> 448 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette);
>> i++) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/build_bug.h:16:62: note: in definition of macro
>> 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'
>> 16 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct {
>> int:(-!!(e)); })))
>> |
>> ^
>> include/linux/compiler.h:224:46: note: in expansion of macro
>> '__same_type'
>> 224 | #define __must_be_array(a)
>> BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/kernel.h:47:59: note: in expansion of macro
>> '__must_be_array'
>> 47 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) +
>> __must_be_array(arr))
>> |
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:448:18: note: in
>> expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
>> 448 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette);
>> i++) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:448:35: error: 'struct
>> ingenic_drm' has no member named 'dma_hwdescs'; did you mean
>> 'dma_hwdesc_f0'?
>> 448 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette);
>> i++) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/build_bug.h:16:62: note: in definition of macro
>> 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'
>> 16 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct {
>> int:(-!!(e)); })))
>> |
>> ^
>> include/linux/compiler.h:224:46: note: in expansion of macro
>> '__same_type'
>> 224 | #define __must_be_array(a)
>> BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/kernel.h:47:59: note: in expansion of macro
>> '__must_be_array'
>> 47 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) +
>> __must_be_array(arr))
>> |
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:448:18: note: in
>> expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
>> 448 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette);
>> i++) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/build_bug.h:16:51: error: bit-field '<anonymous>'
>> width not an integer constant
>> 16 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct {
>> int:(-!!(e)); })))
>> | ^
>> include/linux/compiler.h:224:28: note: in expansion of macro
>> 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'
>> 224 | #define __must_be_array(a)
>> BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/kernel.h:47:59: note: in expansion of macro
>> '__must_be_array'
>> 47 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) +
>> __must_be_array(arr))
>> |
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:448:18: note: in
>> expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
>> 448 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->dma_hwdescs->palette);
>> i++) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:453:9: error: 'struct
>> ingenic_drm' has no member named 'dma_hwdescs'; did you mean
>> 'dma_hwdesc_f0'?
>> 453 | priv->dma_hwdescs->palette[i] = color;
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> | dma_hwdesc_f0
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c: In function
>> 'ingenic_drm_plane_atomic_update':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:467:3: error:
>> 'crtc_state' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean
>> 'ctx_state'?
>> 467 | crtc_state = state->crtc->state;
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> | ctx_state
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:467:3: note: each
>> undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it
>> appears in
>> At top level:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:443:13: warning:
>> 'ingenic_drm_update_palette' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> 443 | static void ingenic_drm_update_palette(struct ingenic_drm
>> *priv,
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> > I noticed that the ingenic driver revert I had been waiting for
>> appeared
>> > in hte drm-misc tree, so I removed the BROKEN dependency for it,
>> but it
>> > produced the above errors, so I have marked it BROKEN again.
>
> Any progress on this? I am still marking CONFIG_DRM_INGENIC as BROKEN
> in the drm and drm-misc trees.
Ugh, that doesn't look good. I'll send a fix ASAP.
(I was having email problems last week and the original email bounced,
sorry about that)
Cheers,
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists