[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201012131607.10656-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:16:07 -0400
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<mhocko@...nel.org>, <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
CC: <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()
The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the
else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess. So we could
replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with else
equally. Also drop the comment which doesn't really explain much.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 2636f8bad908..b080a9434b9e 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -623,14 +623,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess) {
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
rightmost = false;
- }
-
- /*
- * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
- * limit by the same amount
- */
- else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
+ } else {
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+ }
}
if (rightmost)
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists