linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] checkpatch: add shebang check to EXECUTE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04325089b524f20d3de167051bfb81b05083d8b1.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Oct 2020 23:39:36 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Ujjwal Kumar <ujjwalkumar0501@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] checkpatch: add shebang check to
 EXECUTE_PERMISSIONS

On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 08:36 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 08:21 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > What does checkpatch.pl warn about and what does clang-format still warn 
> > > about, which is generally accepted okay as style in the kernel?
> > 
> > clang-format doesn't warn at all, it just reformats.
> > 
> You can run clang-format with --dry-run and then it would just state the 
> proposed changes, right?

clang-format through at least version 10 does not have
a --dry-run option.