[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2010140842310.6186@felia>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:47:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Ujjwal Kumar <ujjwalkumar0501@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] checkpatch: add shebang check to
EXECUTE_PERMISSIONS
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 08:36 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 08:21 +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > > What does checkpatch.pl warn about and what does clang-format still warn
> > > > about, which is generally accepted okay as style in the kernel?
> > >
> > > clang-format doesn't warn at all, it just reformats.
> > >
> > You can run clang-format with --dry-run and then it would just state the
> > proposed changes, right?
>
> clang-format through at least version 10 does not have
> a --dry-run option.
>
>
Just a quick check:
version 9 does not have the --dry-run option:
https://releases.llvm.org/9.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ClangFormat.html
version 10 does:
https://releases.llvm.org/10.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ClangFormat.html
and version 12 (under development) does keep it:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html
I have not played around with that, though.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists