[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc40599d-e964-3a53-f3e7-94c03d3a162c@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:28:23 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: yanfei.xu@...driver.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction: Remove some useless code in compact_zone()
On 14.10.20 09:23, yanfei.xu@...driver.com wrote:
> From: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...driver.com>
>
> start_pfn has been declared at the begin of compact_zone(), it's
> no need to declare it again. And remove an useless semicolon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@...driver.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 176dcded298e..5e69c1f94d96 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -2272,7 +2272,7 @@ compact_zone(struct compact_control *cc, struct capture_control *capc)
>
> while ((ret = compact_finished(cc)) == COMPACT_CONTINUE) {
> int err;
> - unsigned long start_pfn = cc->migrate_pfn;
> + start_pfn = cc->migrate_pfn;
There is a user in
trace_mm_compaction_end(start_pfn, cc->migrate_pfn, cc->free_pfn,
end_pfn, sync, ret);
we would now trace a different value, no?
>
> /*
> * Avoid multiple rescans which can happen if a page cannot be
> @@ -2309,7 +2309,6 @@ compact_zone(struct compact_control *cc, struct capture_control *capc)
> case ISOLATE_SUCCESS:
> update_cached = false;
> last_migrated_pfn = start_pfn;
> - ;
Huh, how does something like that happen :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists