[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vfy9bkny-1gyw7fKf3S=RN-DdZYK40eMC27tE9ApKF6jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 20:14:20 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gpio: uapi: documentation improvements
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:34 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> > <bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
...
> > I am waiting for Kent to respin them addressing Andy's comments
> > on patch 5/5 then they can go in as fixes I think.
> >
>
> I had replied to Andy's comments - I'm prefer with my version than his
> suggestion:
>
> "I'm not keen on that alternative as what it suggests is actually a
> pointer comparison, and even if the user realizes that they may instead
> use "strlen(label) == 0", when they shouldn't be assuming that a null
> terminator is present in the array. I avoided mentioning "string" and
> kept it in terms of the char array for the same reason."
My point is to make documentation less cryptic (= less programming
language stylish).
If you can rephrase it that way - nice! Otherwise, I leave this to Linus.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists