linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] counter: Add character device interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <67a0290e-731b-822a-5113-30b56bde6c88@lechnology.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:43:08 -0500
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org
Cc:     kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com, gwendal@...omium.org,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, syednwaris@...il.com,
        patrick.havelange@...ensium.com, fabrice.gasnier@...com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] counter: Add character device interface

On 9/26/20 9:18 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2be3846e4105
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c


> +/**
> + * counter_push_event - queue event for userspace reading
> + * @counter:	pointer to Counter structure
> + * @event:	triggered event
> + * @channel:	event channel
> + *
> + * Note: If no one is watching for the respective event, it is silently
> + * discarded.
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
> + */
> +int counter_push_event(struct counter_device *const counter, const u8 event,
> +		       const u8 channel)
> +{
> +	struct counter_event ev = {0};
> +	unsigned int copied = 0;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct counter_event_node *event_node;
> +	struct counter_comp_node *comp_node;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	ev.timestamp = ktime_get_ns();
> +	ev.watch.event = event;
> +	ev.watch.channel = channel;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&counter->events_lock, flags);
> +
> +	/* Search for event in the list */
> +	list_for_each_entry(event_node, &counter->events_list, l)
> +		if (event_node->event == event &&
> +		    event_node->channel == channel)
> +			break;
> +
> +	/* If event is not in the list */
> +	if (&event_node->l == &counter->events_list)
> +		goto exit_early;
> +
> +	/* Read and queue relevant comp for userspace */
> +	list_for_each_entry(comp_node, &event_node->comp_list, l) {
> +		err = counter_get_data(counter, comp_node, &ev.value_u8);

Currently all counter devices are memory mapped devices so calling
counter_get_data() here with interrupts disabled is probably OK, but
if any counter drivers are added that use I2C/SPI/etc. that will take
a long time to read, it would cause problems leaving interrupts
disabled here.

Brainstorming: Would it make sense to separate the event from the
component value being read? As I mentioned in one of my previous
reviews, I think there are some cases where we would just want to
know when an event happened and not read any additional data anyway.
In the case of a slow communication bus, this would also let us
queue the event in the kfifo and notify poll right away and then
defer the reads in a workqueue for later.



> +		if (err)
> +			goto err_counter_get_data;
> +
> +		ev.watch.component = comp_node->component;
> +
> +		copied += kfifo_put(&counter->events, ev);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (copied)
> +		wake_up_poll(&counter->events_wait, EPOLLIN);
> +
> +exit_early:
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->events_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_counter_get_data:
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->events_lock, flags);
> +	return err;
> +}