lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:41:19 +0100 From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> CC: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>, "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>, "leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>, "mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "qiangqing.zhang@....com" <qiangqing.zhang@....com>, Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>, "james.clark@....com" <james.clark@....com>, "linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs On 14/10/2020 12:16, Jiri Olsa wrote: >> My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], which >> is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here. >> >> However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as >> baseline, so I'll look at that now. > yes please, I can't already apply 2nd patch.. > > patching file pmu-events/jevents.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 82 with fuzz 2 (offset 29 lines). > Hunk #2 FAILED at 335. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 354. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 406 (offset 22 lines). > Hunk #5 FAILED at 439. > Hunk #6 FAILED at 531. > Hunk #7 FAILED at 555. > Hunk #8 FAILED at 602. > Hunk #9 FAILED at 698. > Hunk #10 succeeded at 770 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #11 succeeded at 813 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #12 succeeded at 1075 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #13 succeeded at 1242 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #14 succeeded at 1273 (offset 2 lines). > 7 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file pmu-events/jevents.c.rej > can't find file to patch at input line 439 OK, so I already did the rebase and it was quite straightforward - the conflicts came with the recent changes in jevents. I will send out soon. Thanks, John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists