linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d385075-41a4-5614-6632-3a1449c73338@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:41:19 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC:     kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
        "leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "qiangqing.zhang@....com" <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        "james.clark@....com" <james.clark@....com>,
        "linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for
 system PMUs

On 14/10/2020 12:16, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], which
>> is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here.
>>
>> However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as
>> baseline, so I'll look at that now.
> yes please, I can't already apply 2nd patch..
> 
> 	patching file pmu-events/jevents.c
> 	Hunk #1 succeeded at 82 with fuzz 2 (offset 29 lines).
> 	Hunk #2 FAILED at 335.
> 	Hunk #3 FAILED at 354.
> 	Hunk #4 succeeded at 406 (offset 22 lines).
> 	Hunk #5 FAILED at 439.
> 	Hunk #6 FAILED at 531.
> 	Hunk #7 FAILED at 555.
> 	Hunk #8 FAILED at 602.
> 	Hunk #9 FAILED at 698.
> 	Hunk #10 succeeded at 770 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #11 succeeded at 813 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #12 succeeded at 1075 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #13 succeeded at 1242 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #14 succeeded at 1273 (offset 2 lines).
> 	7 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file pmu-events/jevents.c.rej
> 	can't find file to patch at input line 439

OK, so I already did the rebase and it was quite straightforward - the 
conflicts came with the recent changes in jevents.

I will send out soon.

Thanks,
John