linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/msm: add DRM_MSM_GEM_SYNC_CACHE for non-coherent cache maintenance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201015153334.GF438822@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:33:34 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" 
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/msm: add DRM_MSM_GEM_SYNC_CACHE for non-coherent
 cache maintenance

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 07:55:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 02:42:38PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > I still think this situation would be best handled with a variant of
> > dma_ops_bypass that also guarantees to bypass SWIOTLB, and can be set
> > automatically when attaching to an unmanaged IOMMU domain.
> 
> dma_ops_bypass should mostly do the right thing as-is.  swiotlb bouncing
> is triggered of two things:
> 
>  1) the dma_mask.  This is under control of the driver, and obviously
>     if it is too small for a legit reason we can't just proceed

Somewhat related, but is there a way to tell the dma-api to fail instead
of falling back to swiotlb? In many case for gpu drivers it's much better
if we fall back to dma_alloc_coherent and manage the copying ourselves
instead of abstracting this away in the dma-api. Currently that's "solved"
rather pessimistically by always allocating from dma_alloc_coherent if
swiotlb could be in the picture (at least for ttm based drivers, i915 just
falls over).
-Daniel

>  2) force_dma_unencrypted() - we'd need to do an opt-out here, either
>     by a flag or by being smart and looking for an attached iommu on
>     the device
> 
> > That way the
> > device driver can make DMA API calls in the appropriate places that do the
> > right thing either way, and only needs logic to decide whether to use the
> > returned DMA addresses directly or ignore them if it knows they're
> > overridden by its own IOMMU mapping.
> 
> I'd be happy to review patches for this.

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch