linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/32] Make charlcd device independent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Oct 2020 05:59:04 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <willy@...roxy.com>,
        Ksenija Stanojevic <ksenija.stanojevic@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/32] Make charlcd device independent

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:33 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Picking these for linux-next (including Rob's Reviewed-by). I have
> spotted a few typos that I corrected -- I will note them by email.

Hmm, I think we should do another round instead, since I found what
looks to be an unintended revert of a previous commit in patch 24.
Lars, can you please take a look?

Also, please take the chance to apply my comments given we have a new
round (and Rob's Reviewed-by too).

By the way, I think you could simplify by squashing the "implement
hd44780_*" commits together (i.e. from 15 to 22 except 20), and the
two cleanups together too (i.e. 20 and 23). I know we asked you to
split things up before, but those two sets are quite similar
(including in their commit message) and easy to understand all
together.

Cheers,
Miguel