[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c02aed9b-ab6c-1054-1e8a-4006f2a75f94@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 05:55:30 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cocci <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Allow --fix removal of unnecessary break
statements
On 10/18/20 1:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 13:07 -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>> I like!
> []
>> could add a '|break' here to catch the couple
> []
>> break;
>>
>> break;
> Unfortunately, checkpatch is really stupid and it
> wouldn't catch those
> cases as there are blank lines
> between the existing consecutive break
> statements.
>
> It would catch
>
> break;
> break;
>
> but there aren't any of those so it seems unlikely
> to be a very useful addition.
Unusual, but there are a couple of these.
Here's one from my rfc diff
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wcd-clsh-v2.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wcd-clsh-v2.c
index 1be82113c59a..817d8259758c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wcd-clsh-v2.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wcd-clsh-v2.c
@@ -478,11 +478,10 @@ static int _wcd_clsh_ctrl_set_state(struct wcd_clsh_ctrl *ctrl, int req_state,
wcd_clsh_state_hph_l(ctrl, req_state, is_enable, mode);
break;
case WCD_CLSH_STATE_HPHR:
wcd_clsh_state_hph_r(ctrl, req_state, is_enable, mode);
break;
- break;
case WCD_CLSH_STATE_LO:
wcd_clsh_state_lo(ctrl, req_state, is_enable, mode);
break;
default:
break;
Tom
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists