[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201020103617.qramu2ejlp44qxcz@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:06:17 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, sbhanu@...eaurora.org,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, nm@...com
Subject: Re: WARNING: at drivers/opp/core.c:678
dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x4cc/0x5d4 - on arm x15
On 16-10-20, 11:15, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +Dave,
>
> On 15-10-20, 15:26, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > The arm x15 boot failed on Linus 's mainline version 5.9.0.
>
> Don't mention the version as this doesn't give the right information.
> You tested it over 5.9 + 5.10-rc1 material.
>
> > I have listed the latest commits on drivers/opp/ .
> >
> > metadata:
> > git branch: master
> > git repo: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/torvalds/linux-mainline
> > git commit: 3e4fb4346c781068610d03c12b16c0cfb0fd24a3
> > git describe: v5.9-4105-g3e4fb4346c78
> > make_kernelversion: 5.9.0
> > kernel-config:
> > https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2BB2g61t29VaadVLXEl4cQ/kernel.config
> >
> >
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 13.530971] sdhci-omap 4809c000.mmc: Got CD GPIO
> > [ 13.535647] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 137 at drivers/opp/core.c:678
> > dev_pm_opp_set_rate+0x4cc/0x5d4
>
> Looks like the stuff from drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c supply didn't
> work as expected.
>
> One of the major changes came with these patches:
>
> dc279ac6e5b4 cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly
> dd461cd9183f opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
>
> And that's where I think it may have gone wrong.
>
> Dave: Will you (or someone else from TI) can have a look at it as well
> ?
http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/be911bcddc1dbf4a152513cb3d83f8eed7d2574c.1603189831.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
I think this will fix it now.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists