lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12dfa2bb-e567-fb42-d74f-5aaa0c5c43df@samsung.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:35:55 +0200
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: arm64 build broken on linux next 20201021 -
 include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:862:26: error: array index in initializer
 exceeds array bounds

Hi Naresh,

On 21.10.2020 07:05, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> arm64 build broken while building linux next 20201021 tag.
>
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:862:26: error: array index in
> initializer exceeds array bounds
> #define __NR_watch_mount 441
>                           ^
>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>

Conflict resolution in commit 5394c6318b32f is incomplete.

This fixes the build:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h 
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
index b3b2019f8d16..86a9d7b3eabe 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
  #define __ARM_NR_compat_set_tls (__ARM_NR_COMPAT_BASE + 5)
  #define __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END            (__ARM_NR_COMPAT_BASE + 0x800)

-#define __NR_compat_syscalls           441
+#define __NR_compat_syscalls           442
  #endif

  #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE
diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h 
b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
index 094a685aa0f9..5df46517260e 100644
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_process_madvise, sys_process_madvise)
  __SYSCALL(__NR_watch_mount, sys_watch_mount)

  #undef __NR_syscalls
-#define __NR_syscalls 441
+#define __NR_syscalls 442

  /*
   * 32 bit systems traditionally used different


Best regards

-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ