linux-kernel - Re: arm64 build broken on linux next 20201021 - include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:862:26: error: array index in initializer exceeds array bounds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:42:50 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: arm64 build broken on linux next 20201021 - include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:862:26:
 error: array index in initializer exceeds array bounds

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 12:06, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On 21.10.2020 07:05, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > arm64 build broken while building linux next 20201021 tag.
> >
> > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:862:26: error: array index in
> > initializer exceeds array bounds
> > #define __NR_watch_mount 441
> >                           ^
> >
> > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
>
> Conflict resolution in commit 5394c6318b32f is incomplete.
>
> This fixes the build:

Thanks for the patch.
I have applied this patch and build pass on arm64.
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>

>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> index b3b2019f8d16..86a9d7b3eabe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>   #define __ARM_NR_compat_set_tls (__ARM_NR_COMPAT_BASE + 5)
>   #define __ARM_NR_COMPAT_END            (__ARM_NR_COMPAT_BASE + 0x800)
>
> -#define __NR_compat_syscalls           441
> +#define __NR_compat_syscalls           442
>   #endif
>
>   #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> index 094a685aa0f9..5df46517260e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_process_madvise, sys_process_madvise)
>   __SYSCALL(__NR_watch_mount, sys_watch_mount)
>
>   #undef __NR_syscalls
> -#define __NR_syscalls 441
> +#define __NR_syscalls 442
>
>   /*
>    * 32 bit systems traditionally used different
>

- Naresh