linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8e07f9401c9f7e18fb1453b7b290472c0049c6e6.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:21:00 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, jens.wiklander@...aro.org, corbet@....net,
        jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
        janne.karhunen@...il.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
        Markus.Wamser@...ed-mode.de, lhinds@...hat.com,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework

On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 15:37 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:

> +/*
> + * trusted_destroy - clear and free the key's payload
> + */
> +static void trusted_destroy(struct key *key)
> +{
> +	kfree_sensitive(key->payload.data[0]);
> +}
> +
> +struct key_type key_type_trusted = {
> +	.name = "trusted",
> +	.instantiate = trusted_instantiate,
> +	.update = trusted_update,
> +	.destroy = trusted_destroy,
> +	.describe = user_describe,
> +	.read = trusted_read,
> +};
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(key_type_trusted);
> +
> +static int __init init_trusted(void)
> +{
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(trusted_key_sources); i++) {
> +		if (trusted_key_source &&
> +		    strncmp(trusted_key_source, trusted_key_sources[i].name,
> +			    strlen(trusted_key_sources[i].name)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		trusted_key_ops = trusted_key_sources[i].ops;
> +
> +		ret = trusted_key_ops->init();
> +		if (!ret)
> +			break;
> +	}

In the case when the module paramater isn't specified and both TPM and
TEE are enabled, trusted_key_ops is set to the last source initialized.
After patch 2/4, the last trusted source initialized is TEE.  If the
intention is to limit it to either TPM or TEE, then trusted_key_ops
should have a default value, which could be overwritten at runtime. 
That would address Luke Hind's concerns of making the decision at
compile time.

trusted_key_ops should be defined as __ro_after_init, like is currently
done for other LSM structures.

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * encrypted_keys.ko depends on successful load of this module even if
> +	 * trusted key implementation is not found.
> +	 */
> +	if (ret == -ENODEV)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit cleanup_trusted(void)
> +{
> +	trusted_key_ops->exit();

If the intention is really to support both TPM and TEE trusted keys at
the same time, as James suggested, then the same "for" loop as in
init_trusted() is needed here and probably elsewhere.

thanks,

Mimi