[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSmRbZqDw83f1Z14nSSVQTeFOvyehXhB=NnbaaANrwe=FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 05:29:49 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead of
selecting it
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:15 AM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS selects EXT4_FS, thus enabling an optional feature the
> > user may not want to enable. Fix this by making the test depend on
> > EXT4_FS instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 1cbeab1b242d16fd ("ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> If I remember correctly, having EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS select EXT4_FS was
> something that Ted specifically requested, but I don't have any strong
> feelings on it either way.
For what it's worth, the upcoming FAT filesystem tests[1] are also
select-ing FAT_FS at the moment, so if this changes here, I'll likely
update it there as well.
-- David
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201021061713.1545931-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u
Powered by blists - more mailing lists