linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52959e99-4105-3de9-730c-c46894b82bdd@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 14:30:53 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead of
 selecting it

On 10/21/20 2:29 PM, David Gow wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:15 AM Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:37 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS selects EXT4_FS, thus enabling an optional feature the
>>> user may not want to enable.  Fix this by making the test depend on
>>> EXT4_FS instead.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1cbeab1b242d16fd ("ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps")
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>>
>> If I remember correctly, having EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS select EXT4_FS was
>> something that Ted specifically requested, but I don't have any strong
>> feelings on it either way.
> 
> For what it's worth, the upcoming FAT filesystem tests[1] are also
> select-ing FAT_FS at the moment, so if this changes here, I'll likely
> update it there as well.
> 
> -- David
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201021061713.1545931-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u
> 

then hopefully both get updated. This is just backwards.

-- 
~Randy