[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30226f94-72e9-34d2-17d0-11d2501053f0@perex.cz>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:03:19 +0200
From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dom Cobley <dom@...pberrypi.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Context expectations in ALSA
Dne 22. 10. 20 v 11:50 Maxime Ripard napsal(a):
> So, I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to do here. The drivers
> involved don't appear to be doing anything extraordinary, but the issues
> lockdep report are definitely valid too. What are the expectations in
> terms of context from ALSA when running the callbacks, and how can we
> fix it?
I think that you should set the non-atomic flag and wake up the workqueue or
so from interrupt handler in this case. Call snd_pcm_period_elapsed() from the
workqueue not the interrupt handler context.
Jaroslav
--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists