[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nfHjXkN65jy+unz0k66qvAALNhhhDZsxqPRLdtLKOW_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:08:42 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:36 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> Use a more generic form for __section that requires quotes to avoid
> complications with clang and gcc differences.
I performed visual inspection (one by one...) and the only thing I saw
is that sometimes the `__attribute__` has a whitespace afterwards and
sometimes it doesn't, same for the commas inside, e.g.:
- __used __attribute__((section(".modinfo"), unused, aligned(1))) \
+ __used __section(".modinfo") __attribute__((unused, aligned(1))) \
and:
- __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
+ __section("__param") __attribute__ ((unused, aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
I think the patch tries to follow the style of the replaced line, but
for the commas in this last case it didn't. Anyway, it is not
important.
I can pick it up in my queue along with the __alias one and keep it
for a few weeks in -next.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists