[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64b49cd3680f45808dad286b408e7b196c31ec79.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 01:03:18 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to
__section("foo")
On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 08:08 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:36 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > Use a more generic form for __section that requires quotes to avoid
> > complications with clang and gcc differences.
>
> I performed visual inspection (one by one...) and the only thing I saw
> is that sometimes the `__attribute__` has a whitespace afterwards and
> sometimes it doesn't, same for the commas inside, e.g.:
>
> - __used __attribute__((section(".modinfo"), unused, aligned(1))) \
> + __used __section(".modinfo") __attribute__((unused, aligned(1))) \
>
> and:
>
> - __attribute__ ((unused,__section__ ("__param"),aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
> + __section("__param") __attribute__ ((unused, aligned(sizeof(void *)))) \
>
> I think the patch tries to follow the style of the replaced line, but
> for the commas in this last case it didn't. Anyway, it is not
> important.
Here the change follows the kernel style of space after comma.
> I can pick it up in my queue along with the __alias one and keep it
> for a few weeks in -next.
Thanks Miguel, but IMO it doesn't need time in next.
Applying it just before an rc1 minimizes conflicts.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists