linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add optee node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW0d3WRwupF-ZEnMdkumwLtRAw9yCLnb4AJ3RGZGP7Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:49:51 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add optee node

Hi Prabhakar,

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:56 AM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> Add optee device tree node to HiHope RZ/G2{HMN} boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi
> @@ -110,6 +110,13 @@
>                 #clock-cells = <0>;
>                 clock-frequency = <25000000>;
>         };
> +
> +       firmware {
> +               optee {
> +                       compatible = "linaro,optee-tz";
> +                       method = "smc";
> +               };
> +       };
>  };

Should this be added to the SoC-specific .dtsi instead?
How can we test this?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds