[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201026212737.GA113829@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:27:37 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to
__section("foo")
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:41 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86_64 defconfig:
> >
> > Building um:defconfig ... failed
> > --------------
> > Error log:
> > arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.c:24:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant
> > arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c:11:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant
>
> Weird. Is __section() not defined somehow for those files?
>
> It does look like they have very minimal headers, so undoing that
> patch just for those two files is likely the right thing to do.
>
> > As with s390, reverting this patch fixes the problem.
>
> s390 should be fixed already.
>
> Is the attached minimal patch sufficient for um to get back to working
> order, or is there something else hiding there too?
>
That works for me.
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists