[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201026212930.GB113829@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:29:30 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bruno Thomsen <bruno.thomsen@...il.com>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly
available
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 09:48:11PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 26/10/2020 07:23:26+0000, Qiang Zhao wrote:
> > Any update for this patchset?
> >
>
> The whole point would be to get the DT and the watchdog maintainers
> agree on the property name. Once done, the driver implementation is
> trivial and will get applied.
>
DT maintainers make that decision.
Guenter
> > Best Regards
> > Qiang Zhao
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > Sent: 2020年9月24日 18:53
> > > To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>; Qiang Zhao
> > > <qiang.zhao@....com>; Bruno Thomsen <bruno.thomsen@...il.com>
> > > Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org; a.zummo@...ertech.it;
> > > linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; robh+dt@...nel.org; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> > > Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>; Guenter Roeck
> > > <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 0/2] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > now that there are two people stumbling over the pcf2127 driver providing a
> > > non-functional watchdog device, here comes an RFC patch to address this.
> > >
> > > Note this is only compile tested and dt-documentation is still missing.
> > > Still send this series because the cleanup is nice independent of this discussion
> > > and to have something to argue about.
> > >
> > > Does someone can offer a better name than "has-watchdog", is there a scheme
> > > that could be used already that I'm not aware of?
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Uwe
> > >
> > > Uwe Kleine-König (2):
> > > rtc: pcf2127: move watchdog initialisation to a separate function
> > > [RFC] rtc: pcf2127: only use watchdog when explicitly available
> > >
> > > drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2127.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> >
>
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists