linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND 01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:22:40 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Biwen Li <biwen.li@....nxp.com>, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, leoyang.li@....com,
        zhiqiang.hou@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jiafei.pan@....com, xiaobo.xie@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND 01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external
 interrupt

On 2020-10-26 09:06, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 26/10/2020 09.44, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2020-10-26 08:01, Biwen Li wrote:
>>> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
>>> 
>>> Add an new IRQ chip declaration for LS1043A and LS1088A
>>> - compatible "fsl,ls1043a-extirq" for LS1043A, LS1046A
>>> - compatible "fsl,ls1088a-extirq" for LS1088A, LS208xA, LX216xA
>> 
>> Three things:
>> - This commit message doesn't describe the bit_reverse change
> 
> Yeah, please elaborate on that, as the RM for 1043 or 1046 doesn't
> mention anything about bit reversal for the scfg registers - they don't
> seem to have the utter nonsense that is SCFG_SCFGREVCR, but perhaps,
> instead of removing it, that has just become a hard-coded part of the 
> IP.
> 
> Also, IANAL etc., but
> 
>>> +// Copyright 2019-2020 NXP
> 
> really? Seems to be a bit of a stretch.
> 
> At the very least, cc'ing the original author and only person to ever
> touch that file would have been appreciated.

Huh. Well spotted. That's definitely not on.
NXP people, please talk to your legal department.

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...