[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201026174152.GA10163@rlk>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:41:52 +0800
From: Hui Su <sh_def@....com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: use list_is_singular() instead of '->prev !=
->next'
Use the list_is_singular(&rt_se->run_list) api instead of
'rt_se->run_list.prev != rt_se->run_list.next'.
Fix a comment by the way, and make the comment more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@....com>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 49ec096a8aa1..1479d00656b4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2381,7 +2381,7 @@ static inline void watchdog(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
*
* NOTE: This function can be called remotely by the tick offload that
* goes along full dynticks. Therefore no local assumption can be made
- * and everything must be accessed through the @rq and @curr passed in
+ * and everything must be accessed through the @rq and @p passed in
* parameters.
*/
static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
@@ -2406,11 +2406,11 @@ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
p->rt.time_slice = sched_rr_timeslice;
/*
- * Requeue to the end of queue if we (and all of our ancestors) are not
- * the only element on the queue
+ * Requeue to the end of rt_prio_array queue if we (and all of our
+ * ancestors) are not the only element on the rt_prio_array queue.
*/
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
- if (rt_se->run_list.prev != rt_se->run_list.next) {
+ if (!list_is_singular(&rt_se->run_list)) {
requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 0);
resched_curr(rq);
return;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists