lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a368355b-4bf3-05b8-9fa0-ee3feb58f8bf@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:47:06 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] perf data: open data directory in read access
 mode


On 24.10.2020 18:43, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 06:57:53PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>
>> Open files located at trace data directory in case read access
>> mode is requested. File are opened and its fds assigned to
>> perf_data dir files especially for loading data directories
>> content in perf report mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/util/data.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/data.c b/tools/perf/util/data.c
>> index c47aa34fdc0a..6ad61ac6ba67 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/data.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/data.c
>> @@ -321,6 +321,10 @@ static int open_dir(struct perf_data *data)
>>  		return -1;
>>  
>>  	ret = open_file(data);
>> +	if (!ret && perf_data__is_dir(data)) {
>> +		if (perf_data__is_read(data))
>> +			ret = perf_data__open_dir(data);
>> +	}
> 
> perf_data__open_dir is also called from perf_session__new
> is it called twice?

It is not called twice. It is in different branches.
This one is for write and the other one is for read.

Alexei

> 
> jirka
> 
>>  
>>  	/* Cleanup whatever we managed to create so far. */
>>  	if (ret && perf_data__is_write(data))
>> -- 
>> 2.24.1
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ