[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebfb865f-ded3-41c7-b679-7fc50a258a8c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:16:43 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexei Budankov <budankov.lore@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] perf record: introduce thread local variable for
trace streaming
On 27.10.2020 15:01, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:11:30PM +0300, Alexei Budankov wrote:
<SNIP>
>> Why do you complain about per thread variable in this case?
>> It looks like ideally fits these specific needs.
>
> I think there's misunderstanding.. I think we should move
> samples to per thread 'thread' object and have just one
> copy of that.. and do not increase separate variables for
> thread and non-thread cases
Aw, I see. Using the same __thread object by main thread in
serial and threaded modes. That makes sense.
I will correct in v3.
Alexei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists