[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201027031350.GC32667@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:13:50 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Al Grant <Al.Grant@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/20] perf arm-spe: Add support for ARMv8.3-SPE
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:17:20PM +0000, André Przywara wrote:
> On 22/10/2020 15:58, Leo Yan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > From: Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>
> >
> > This patch is to support Armv8.3 extension for SPE, it adds alignment
> > field in the Events packet and it supports the Scalable Vector Extension
> > (SVE) for Operation packet and Events packet with two additions:
> >
> > - The vector length for SVE operations in the Operation Type packet;
> > - The incomplete predicate and empty predicate fields in the Events
> > packet.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > .../arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > .../arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h | 18 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > index 74ac12cbec69..6da4cfbc9914 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > @@ -332,6 +332,21 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_event(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > + if (payload & BIT(EV_ALIGNMENT)) {
> > + ret = arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&buf, &blen, " ALIGNMENT");
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + if (payload & BIT(EV_PARTIAL_PREDICATE)) {
> > + ret = arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&buf, &blen, " SVE-PARTIAL-PRED");
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + if (payload & BIT(EV_EMPTY_PREDICATE)) {
> > + ret = arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&buf, &blen, " SVE-EMPTY-PRED");
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > return buf_len - blen;
> > }
> > @@ -345,8 +360,43 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_op_type(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> >
> > switch (class) {
> > case SPE_OP_PKT_HDR_CLASS_OTHER:
> > - return arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&buf, &blen,
> > - payload & SPE_OP_PKT_COND ? "COND-SELECT" : "INSN-OTHER");
> > + if (SPE_OP_PKT_OTHER_SUBCLASS_SVE_OP_GET(payload) ==
> > + SPE_OP_PKT_OTHER_SUBCLASS_SVE_OP) {
>
> Same comment as in the other patch, can you combine those two into one
> symbol?
Thanks for the suggestion, have refined patches for this and sent out
patch set v4 for reviewing.
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists