linux-kernel - [patch 0/2] x86/fpu: Make fpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201027100949.181320853@linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:09:49 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [patch 0/2] x86/fpu: Make fpu_lock() RT compliant

FPU serialization uses

    preempt_disable(); local_bh_disable();

which is silly because local_bh_disable() implicitly disables
preemption. So this can be reduced to local_bh_disable().

But this does not work on RT kernels because local_bh_disable() only
serializes bottom half related processing via a local lock, but does not
disable preemption.

On RT kernels preempt_disable() is the right choice because on RT bottom
half processing is always in thread context, so preempt_disable()
implicitly protects against bottom half processing there.

Thanks,

	tglx