[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201027101349.588965083@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:09:51 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [patch 2/2] x86/fpu: Make kernel FPU protection RT friendly
Non RT kernels need to protect FPU against preemption and bottom half
processing. This is achieved by disabling bottom halfs via
local_bh_disable() which implictly disables preemption.
On RT kernels this protection mechanism is not sufficient because
local_bh_disable() does not disable preemption. It serializes bottom half
related processing via a CPU local lock.
As bottom halfs are running always in thread context on RT kernels
disabling preemption is the proper choice as it implicitly prevents bottom
half processing.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
@@ -32,15 +32,27 @@ extern void fpregs_mark_activate(void);
*
* local_bh_disable() protects against both preemption and soft interrupts
* on !RT kernels.
+ *
+ * On RT kernels local_bh_disable() is not sufficient because it only
+ * serializes soft interrupt related sections via a local lock, but stays
+ * preemptible. Disabling preemption is the right choice here as bottom
+ * half processing is always in thread context on RT kernels so it
+ * implicitly prevents bottom half processing as well.
*/
static inline void fpregs_lock(void)
{
- local_bh_disable();
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ local_bh_disable();
+ else
+ preempt_disable();
}
static inline void fpregs_unlock(void)
{
- local_bh_enable();
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+ local_bh_enable();
+ else
+ preempt_enable();
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_DEBUG_FPU
Powered by blists - more mailing lists