Message-ID: <d5f0bcba-5366-87da-d199-a85d59ba6c1c@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:23:13 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
        Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>
Cc:     dvhart@...radead.org, mgross@...ux.intel.com,
        mario.limonciello@...l.com, eliadevito@...il.com, bberg@...hat.com,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Add documentation for new platform_profile
 sysfs attribute

Hi,

On 10/28/20 2:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey Hans, Mark,
> 
> On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 12:42 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
>> From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>
>> On modern systems the platform performance, temperature, fan and
>> other
>> hardware related characteristics are often dynamically configurable.
>> The
>> profile is often automatically adjusted to the load by somei
>> automatic-mechanism (which may very well live outside the kernel).
>>
>> These auto platform-adjustment mechanisms often can be configured
>> with
>> one of several 'platform-profiles', with either a bias towards low-
>> power
> 
> Can you please make sure to quote 'platform-profile' and 'profile-name'
> this way all through the document? They're not existing words, and
> quoting them shows that they're attribute names, rather than English.
> 
>> consumption or towards performance (and higher power consumption and
>> thermals).
> 
> s/thermal/temperature/
> 
> "A thermal" is something else (it's seasonal underwear for me ;)
> 
>> Introduce a new platform_profile sysfs API which offers a generic API
>> for
>> selecting the performance-profile of these automatic-mechanisms.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V1:
>>  - Moved from RFC to proposed patch
>>  - Added cool profile as requested
>>  - removed extra-profiles as no longer relevant
>>
>>  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile        | 66
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
>> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..240bd3d7532b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
>> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
>> +Platform-profile selection (e.g.
>> /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile)
>> +
>> +On modern systems the platform performance, temperature, fan and
>> other
>> +hardware related characteristics are often dynamically configurable.
>> The
>> +profile is often automatically adjusted to the load by some
>> +automatic-mechanism (which may very well live outside the kernel).
>> +
>> +These auto platform-adjustment mechanisms often can be configured
>> with
>> +one of several 'platform-profiles', with either a bias towards low-
>> power
>> +consumption or towards performance (and higher power consumption and
>> +thermals).
>> +
>> +The purpose of the platform_profile attribute is to offer a generic
>> sysfs
>> +API for selecting the platform-profile of these automatic-
>> mechanisms.
>> +
>> +Note that this API is only for selecting the platform-profile, it is
>> +NOT a goal of this API to allow monitoring the resulting performance
>> +characteristics. Monitoring performance is best done with
>> device/vendor
>> +specific tools such as e.g. turbostat.
>> +
>> +Specifically when selecting a high-performance profile the actual
>> achieved
>> +performance may be limited by various factors such as: the heat
>> generated
>> +by other components, room temperature, free air flow at the bottom
>> of a
>> +laptop, etc. It is explicitly NOT a goal of this API to let
>> userspace know
>> +about any sub-optimal conditions which are impeding reaching the
>> requested
>> +performance level.
>> +
>> +Since numbers are a rather meaningless way to describe platform-
>> profiles
> 
> It's not meaningless, but rather ambiguous. For a range of 1 to 5, is 1
> high performance, and 5 low power, or vice-versa?

It is meaningless because the space we are trying to describe with the
profile-names is not 1 dimensional. E.g. as discussed before cool and
low-power are not necessarily the same thing. If you have a better way
to word this I'm definitely in favor of improving the text here.

> 
>> +this API uses strings to describe the various profiles. To make sure
>> that
>> +userspace gets a consistent experience when using this API this API
> 
> you can remove "when using this API".
> 
>> +document defines a fixed set of profile-names. Drivers *must* map
>> their
>> +internal profile representation/names onto this fixed set.
>> +
>> +If for some reason there is no good match when mapping then a new
>> profile-name
>> +may be added.
> 
> "for some reason" can be removed.
> 
>>  Drivers which wish to introduce new profile-names must:
>> +1. Have very good reasons to do so.
> 
> "1. Explain why the existing 'profile-names' cannot be used"
> 
>> +2. Add the new profile-name to this document, so that future drivers
>> which also
>> +   have a similar problem can use the same name.
> 
> "2. Add the new 'profile-name' to the documentation so that other
> drivers can use it, as well as user-space knowing clearly what
> behaviour the 'profile-name' corresponds to"
> 
>> +
>> +What:          /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile_choices
>> +Date:          October 2020
>> +Contact:       Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> +Description:
>> +               Reading this file gives a space separated list of
>> profiles
>> +               supported for this device.
> 
> "This file contains a space-separated list of profiles..."
> 
>> +
>> +               Drivers must use the following standard profile-
>> names:
>> +
>> +               low-power:              Emphasises low power
>> consumption
>> +               cool:                   Emphasises cooler operation
>> +               quiet:                  Emphasises quieter operation
>> +               balanced:               Balance between low power
>> consumption
>> +                                       and performance
>> +               performance:            Emphasises performance (and
>> may lead to
>> +                                       higher temperatures and fan
>> speeds)
> 
> I'd replace "Emphasises" with either "Focus on" or the US English
> spelling of "Emphasizes".
> 
>> +               Userspace may expect drivers to offer at least
>> several of these
>> +               standard profile-names.
> 
> Replce "at least several" with "more than one".
> 
>> +
>> +What:          /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile
>> +Date:          October 2020
>> +Contact:       Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> +Description:
>> +               Reading this file gives the current selected profile
>> for this
>> +               device. Writing this file with one of the strings
>> from
>> +               available_profiles changes the profile to the new
>> value.
> 
> Is there another file which explains whether those sysfs value will
> contain a trailing linefeed?

sysfs APIs are typically created so that they can be used from the shell,
so on read a newline will be added. On write a newline at the end
typically is allowed, but ignored. There are even special helper functions
to deal with properly ignoring the newline on write.

Regards,

Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists