[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ca1ae238b23a611b8a490c244fd93cdcc36ef79.camel@hadess.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:45:15 +0100
From: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
To: Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>
Cc: dvhart@...radead.org, mgross@...ux.intel.com,
mario.limonciello@...l.com, eliadevito@...il.com, bberg@...hat.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Add documentation for new
platform_profile sysfs attribute
Hey Hans, Mark,
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 12:42 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> On modern systems the platform performance, temperature, fan and
> other
> hardware related characteristics are often dynamically configurable.
> The
> profile is often automatically adjusted to the load by somei
> automatic-mechanism (which may very well live outside the kernel).
>
> These auto platform-adjustment mechanisms often can be configured
> with
> one of several 'platform-profiles', with either a bias towards low-
> power
Can you please make sure to quote 'platform-profile' and 'profile-name'
this way all through the document? They're not existing words, and
quoting them shows that they're attribute names, rather than English.
> consumption or towards performance (and higher power consumption and
> thermals).
s/thermal/temperature/
"A thermal" is something else (it's seasonal underwear for me ;)
> Introduce a new platform_profile sysfs API which offers a generic API
> for
> selecting the performance-profile of these automatic-mechanisms.
>
> Co-developed-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> ---
> Changes in V1:
> - Moved from RFC to proposed patch
> - Added cool profile as requested
> - removed extra-profiles as no longer relevant
>
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile | 66
> +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..240bd3d7532b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +Platform-profile selection (e.g.
> /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile)
> +
> +On modern systems the platform performance, temperature, fan and
> other
> +hardware related characteristics are often dynamically configurable.
> The
> +profile is often automatically adjusted to the load by some
> +automatic-mechanism (which may very well live outside the kernel).
> +
> +These auto platform-adjustment mechanisms often can be configured
> with
> +one of several 'platform-profiles', with either a bias towards low-
> power
> +consumption or towards performance (and higher power consumption and
> +thermals).
> +
> +The purpose of the platform_profile attribute is to offer a generic
> sysfs
> +API for selecting the platform-profile of these automatic-
> mechanisms.
> +
> +Note that this API is only for selecting the platform-profile, it is
> +NOT a goal of this API to allow monitoring the resulting performance
> +characteristics. Monitoring performance is best done with
> device/vendor
> +specific tools such as e.g. turbostat.
> +
> +Specifically when selecting a high-performance profile the actual
> achieved
> +performance may be limited by various factors such as: the heat
> generated
> +by other components, room temperature, free air flow at the bottom
> of a
> +laptop, etc. It is explicitly NOT a goal of this API to let
> userspace know
> +about any sub-optimal conditions which are impeding reaching the
> requested
> +performance level.
> +
> +Since numbers are a rather meaningless way to describe platform-
> profiles
It's not meaningless, but rather ambiguous. For a range of 1 to 5, is 1
high performance, and 5 low power, or vice-versa?
> +this API uses strings to describe the various profiles. To make sure
> that
> +userspace gets a consistent experience when using this API this API
you can remove "when using this API".
> +document defines a fixed set of profile-names. Drivers *must* map
> their
> +internal profile representation/names onto this fixed set.
> +
> +If for some reason there is no good match when mapping then a new
> profile-name
> +may be added.
"for some reason" can be removed.
> Drivers which wish to introduce new profile-names must:
> +1. Have very good reasons to do so.
"1. Explain why the existing 'profile-names' cannot be used"
> +2. Add the new profile-name to this document, so that future drivers
> which also
> + have a similar problem can use the same name.
"2. Add the new 'profile-name' to the documentation so that other
drivers can use it, as well as user-space knowing clearly what
behaviour the 'profile-name' corresponds to"
> +
> +What: /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile_choices
> +Date: October 2020
> +Contact: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> +Description:
> + Reading this file gives a space separated list of
> profiles
> + supported for this device.
"This file contains a space-separated list of profiles..."
> +
> + Drivers must use the following standard profile-
> names:
> +
> + low-power: Emphasises low power
> consumption
> + cool: Emphasises cooler operation
> + quiet: Emphasises quieter operation
> + balanced: Balance between low power
> consumption
> + and performance
> + performance: Emphasises performance (and
> may lead to
> + higher temperatures and fan
> speeds)
I'd replace "Emphasises" with either "Focus on" or the US English
spelling of "Emphasizes".
> + Userspace may expect drivers to offer at least
> several of these
> + standard profile-names.
Replce "at least several" with "more than one".
> +
> +What: /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile
> +Date: October 2020
> +Contact: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> +Description:
> + Reading this file gives the current selected profile
> for this
> + device. Writing this file with one of the strings
> from
> + available_profiles changes the profile to the new
> value.
Is there another file which explains whether those sysfs value will
contain a trailing linefeed?
Cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists