[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANp29Y6hyz7xQi=7OG3CBAS0vMQ98S1=H4ZQK9socNUeY_XiKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:42:06 +0300
From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Aleksandr Nogikh <aleksandrnogikh@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mac80211: add KCOV remote annotations to incoming
frame processing
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:25 PM Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
[...]
> Wouldn't it make more sense to push that a layer down
> into ieee80211_rx_napi(), or actually now perhaps even
> better ieee80211_rx_list(), so we get it even if the driver called that
> API in the first place?
>
> You might only care about hwsim at this point, but perhaps hwsim would
> get optimised ..
Yes, ieee80211_rx_list() seems to be a reasonable place to move these
annotations to. Thanks for the suggestion.
I've incorporated this change into v5:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029173620.2121359-1-aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists