[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201029174302.GV2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:43:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com,
tj@...nel.org, ouwen210@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/19] sched: Add migrate_disable() tracepoints
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 04:27:26PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>
> On 23/10/20 11:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -1732,6 +1732,8 @@ void migrate_disable(void)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + trace_sched_migrate_disable_tp(p);
> > +
> > preempt_disable();
> > this_rq()->nr_pinned++;
> > p->migration_disabled = 1;
> > @@ -1764,6 +1766,8 @@ void migrate_enable(void)
> > p->migration_disabled = 0;
> > this_rq()->nr_pinned--;
> > preempt_enable();
> > +
> > + trace_sched_migrate_enable_tp(p);
>
> Don't you want those directly after the ->migration_disabled write?
> esp. for migrate_enable(), if that preempt_enable() leads to a context
> switch then the disable->enable deltas won't reflect the kernel view.
>
> That delta may indeed include the time it took to run the stopper and
> fix the task's affinity on migrate_enable(), but it could include all
> sorts of other higher-priority tasks.
I can put them in the preempt_disable() section I suppose, but these
tracers should be looking at task_sched_runtime(), not walltime, and
then the preemption doesn't matter.
Also, a distinct lack of actual users atm.. :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists