linux-kernel - Re: [v4,1/3] drm/msm: Add support for GPU cooling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:48:42 -0700
From:   mka@...omium.org
To:     Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, dri-devel@...edesktop.org
Subject: Re: [v4,1/3] drm/msm: Add support for GPU cooling

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:37:19PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> Register GPU as a devfreq cooling device so that it can be passively
> cooled by the thermal framework.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>

Wait, I did not post a 'Reviewed-by' tag for this patch!

I think the patch should be ok, but I'm still not super happy
about the resource management involving devfreq in general (see
discussion on https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/394291/?series=82476&rev=1).
It's not really something introduced by this patch, but if it ever
gets fixed releasing the cooling device at the end of
msm_gpu_cleanup() after everything else might cause trouble.

In summary, I'm supportive of landing this patch, but reluctant to
'sign it off' because of the above.

In any case:

Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>