lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5DB475451BAA174CB158B5E897FC1525B1294F5F@MBS07.vivotek.tw>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:24:18 +0000
From:   <Michael.Wu@...ics.com>
To:     <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <morgan.chang@...ics.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] i2c: designware: call
 i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() once

Hi,

> On 10/23/20 8:40 AM, Michael Wu wrote:
> > If some bits were cleared by i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() in
> > i2c_dw_isr_slave() and not handled immediately, those cleared bits would
> > not be shown again by later i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave(). They
> > therefore were forgotten to be handled.
> >
> > i2c_dw_read_clear_intrbits_slave() should be called once in an ISR and take
> > its returned state for all later handlings.
> > ---
> >   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 7 +------
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>

There is another logic issue about the I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED reporting.
May I give patches based on this commit?

Michael Wu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ