[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7cad0f8-5831-7730-42d5-fa6d8c46edbb@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:00:18 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] init/Kconfig: Fix CPU number in
LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT description
Dear Petr,
Am 11.08.20 um 11:29 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Currently, LOG_BUF_SHIFT defaults to 17, which is 2 ^ 17 bytes = 128 KB,
> and LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT defaults to 12, which is 2 ^ 12 bytes = 4 KB.
>
> Half of 128 KB is 64 KB, so more than 16 CPUs are required for the value
> to be used, as then the sum of contributions is greater than 64 KB for
> the first time. My guess is, that the description was written with the
> configuration values used in the SUSE in mind.
>
> Fixes: 23b2899f7f ("printk: allow increasing the ring buffer depending on the number of CPUs")
> Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
> ---
> v2: Add Reviewed-by tag
>
> init/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index d6a0b31b13dc..9dc607e3806f 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ config LOG_CPU_MAX_BUF_SHIFT
> with more CPUs. Therefore this value is used only when the sum of
> contributions is greater than the half of the default kernel ring
> buffer as defined by LOG_BUF_SHIFT. The default values are set
> - so that more than 64 CPUs are needed to trigger the allocation.
> + so that more than 16 CPUs are needed to trigger the allocation.
>
> Also this option is ignored when "log_buf_len" kernel parameter is
> used as it forces an exact (power of two) size of the ring buffer.
Could you please apply this trivial patch from the two patches already,
so I do not have to resend it?
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists