linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 v2 ] platform/x86: Corrects warning: missing braces around initializer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 19:42:25 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trix@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 v2 ] platform/x86: Corrects warning: missing braces
 around initializer

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:18:44PM -0500, John Donnelly wrote:
> > On Oct 30, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 08:55:01AM -0700, john.p.donnelly@...cle.com wrote:
> >> From: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
> >> 
> >> The assignment statement of a local variable "struct tp_nvram_state s[2] = {0};
> >> is not valid for all versions of compilers.
> > 
> > I don't get the subject. IS it backport of existing change to v4.14, or you are
> > trying to fix v4.14? If the latter is the case, it's not correct order. Try
> > latest vanilla first (v5.10-rc1 as of today) and if there is still an issue,
> > submit a patch.
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  It is only intended for 4.14. Why would you back port  a commit  to a stable tree that emits warnings ?

So, if this is for stable, what is the current commit in the kernel of this?

> >> Fixes: 515ded02bc4b ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: initialize tp_nvram_state variable")
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
> > 
> > Should not be blank line in between.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko