linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 v2 ] platform/x86: Corrects warning: missing braces around initializer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <105E5DC2-1B23-40BF-95A1-1B8443575AF6@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:18:44 -0500
From:   John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trix@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 v2 ] platform/x86: Corrects warning: missing braces
 around initializer



> On Oct 30, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 08:55:01AM -0700, john.p.donnelly@...cle.com wrote:
>> From: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
>> 
>> The assignment statement of a local variable "struct tp_nvram_state s[2] = {0};
>> is not valid for all versions of compilers.
> 
> I don't get the subject. IS it backport of existing change to v4.14, or you are
> trying to fix v4.14? If the latter is the case, it's not correct order. Try
> latest vanilla first (v5.10-rc1 as of today) and if there is still an issue,
> submit a patch.

Hi,

 It is only intended for 4.14. Why would you back port  a commit  to a stable tree that emits warnings ?




> 
>> Fixes: 515ded02bc4b ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: initialize tp_nvram_state variable")
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
> 
> Should not be blank line in between.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>