linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] fs: Fix memory leaks in do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:22:13 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] fs: Fix memory leaks in do_renameat2() error paths

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:33:11PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/30/20 12:49 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:46:26PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 
> >> See other reply, it's being posted soon, just haven't gotten there yet
> >> and it wasn't ready.
> >>
> >> It's a prep patch so we can call do_renameat2 and pass in a filename
> >> instead. The intent is not to have any functional changes in that prep
> >> patch. But once we can pass in filenames instead of user pointers, it's
> >> usable from io_uring.
> > 
> > You do realize that pathname resolution is *NOT* offloadable to helper
> > threads, I hope...
> 
> How so? If we have all the necessary context assigned, what's preventing
> it from working?

Semantics of /proc/self/..., for starters (and things like /proc/mounts, etc.
*do* pass through that, /dev/stdin included)