[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c46b1d9-3bf4-9a76-5328-0fb3bb0b42f2@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:53:26 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
Am 30.10.20 um 01:07 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c: In function 'nouveau_ttm_init':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:320:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'swiotlb_nr_tbl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 320 | need_swiotlb = !!swiotlb_nr_tbl();
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mhm, thanks for the note. Looks like there is some merge conflict to me.
In my tree there is an "#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB) &&
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)" around that line making sure the function is
available.
Going to take a look later today.
Christian.
> Caused by commit
>
> ee5d2a8e549e ("drm/ttm: wire up the new pool as default one v2")
>
> I have used the drm-misc tree from next-20201029 for today.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists