[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497f744e-68be-7a87-6a18-824249ddcac8@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:36:24 +0200
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: ti: Enable networking options
for nfs boot
Hi Arnd,
On 29/10/2020 22:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:15 PM Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@...com> wrote:
>> On 02/10/2020 15:50, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 23:27-20201001, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>> Enable networking options required for NFS boot on TI platforms, which is
>>>> widely for automated test systems.
>>>> - enable new TI CPSW switch driver and related NET_SWITCHDEV config
>>>> - enable TI DP83867 phy
>>>> - explicitly enable PTP clock support to ensure dependent networking
>>>> drivers will stay built-in
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
>>>
>>
>> Are there any actions need to be done to have this patch merged?
>
> I would prefer if a platform maintainer (I assume Tony in this case)
> picks it up and forwards it to soc@...nel.org together with other
> related changes. Olof and I tend to ignore patches sent directly
> to us, so we don't get in the way of platform maintainers that
> may have already merged similar patches or have comments.
>
> I suspect Tony didn't pick it up either because from the patch
> subject and the description, it is not clear that he is the one
> to act on it. It helps to be more specific and ask the maintainer
> by addressing them in person below the '---' line, as well as
> only putting one person in 'To:' and the rest in 'Cc:'.
Thanks for your comments and sorry that I disturbed you.
But, honestly, I'm confused (and probably I'm not the first one) as multi_v7 is common
for all ARM platforms while change is TI OMAP specific,
and neither Documentation neither get_maintainer.pl provide any reliable information
on how to proceed :( and who should be responsible for merging multi_x patches.
I'd really have tried to do some checking while preparing patch and TO/CC list - some patches applied by
platform maintainers, but some by top ARM maintainers.
>
> One comment on the contents of the patch: IIRC this is a fairly
> large driver. To ensure we don't burden other users too much,
> can you include the size of the vmlinux file before and after
> this patch?
before:
text data bss dec hex filename
14703736 8024602 444976 23173314 16198c2 ./omap-arm/vmlinux
after:
text data bss dec hex filename
14727271 8029150 444528 23200949 16204b5 ./omap-arm/vmlinux
diff: 27635 (dec)
--
Best regards,
grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists