lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:27:51 +0800
From:   Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
        daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org, lkp@...el.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
        kirill@...temov.name, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
        rong.a.chen@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
        shy828301@...il.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if
 memcg disabled



在 2020/10/29 下午9:46, Johannes Weiner 写道:
>>  ? release_pages+0x1ae/0x410
>>  shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x77/0x1c0
>>  shmem_getpage_gfp+0x162/0x910
>>  shmem_fault+0x74/0x210
>>  ? filemap_map_pages+0x29c/0x410
>>  __do_fault+0x37/0x190
>>  handle_mm_fault+0x120a/0x1770
>>  exc_page_fault+0x251/0x450
>>  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
>>  asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> 
> This should go in before the previous patch that adds the WARN for it.

Right, but than the long ops may not weird. Should I remove the ops and resend the whole patchset?

Which way is convenient for you?

Thanks
Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ