[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96b6d122-df0e-dfb0-368c-6bd714fab116@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:27:51 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org, lkp@...el.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
kirill@...temov.name, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
rong.a.chen@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
shy828301@...il.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if
memcg disabled
在 2020/10/29 下午9:46, Johannes Weiner 写道:
>> ? release_pages+0x1ae/0x410
>> shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x77/0x1c0
>> shmem_getpage_gfp+0x162/0x910
>> shmem_fault+0x74/0x210
>> ? filemap_map_pages+0x29c/0x410
>> __do_fault+0x37/0x190
>> handle_mm_fault+0x120a/0x1770
>> exc_page_fault+0x251/0x450
>> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
>> asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>
> This should go in before the previous patch that adds the WARN for it.
Right, but than the long ops may not weird. Should I remove the ops and resend the whole patchset?
Which way is convenient for you?
Thanks
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists