linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: accel: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201031110511.515a2f0f@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:05:11 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: accel: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:34:10 +0800
Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:42 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:  
> >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:48:56 +0800
> >> Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com> wrote:  
> >  
> >> Please put a cover letter on your next series explaining the context.
> >> In this particular case some of the replies you have gotten are
> >> general at it is a lot easier to find these sorts of things via
> >> replying to the cover letter.  
> >
> >Looking at the number of duplicate messages I would suggest that one
> >needs to go through documentation on how to use git format-patch and
> >git send-email.
> >  
> 
> Thank you for the suggestion! Actually it's a tree-wide change and it
> seems the kernel community prefer individual patches or series for
> subsystems having the same maintainer over a huge patch set so I wrote
> some scripts to automate the process. That's why you see ~50 emails
> with almost the same commit message. The only difference of these
> commit messages is the name of PM macro.

When doing a bit set like this, it's worth sending out a small subset
first to shake out issue like those seen here.

Once those get merged then send out out the reset.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> >--
> >With Best Regards,
> >Andy Shevchenko  
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Coiby