| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 00:20:30 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 52/52] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Separate configurations
per-SoC generation
Hi Dmitry,
I added the review about 'ARRAY_SIZE(tegra124_device_configs)'.
Except for this, it looks good to me.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 7:21 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Previously we were using count-weight of the T124 for T30 in order to
> get EMC clock rate that was reasonable for T30. In fact the count-weight
> should be x2 times smaller on T30, but then devfreq was producing a bit
> too low EMC clock rate for ISO memory clients, like display controller
> for example.
>
> Now both Tegra ACTMON and Tegra DRM display drivers support interconnect
> framework and display driver tells to ICC what a minimum memory bandwidth
> is needed, preventing FIFO underflows. Thus, now we can use a proper
> count-weight value for Tegra30 and MC_ALL device config needs a bit more
> aggressive boosting.
>
> This patch adds a separate ACTMON driver configuration that is specific
> to Tegra30.
>
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> index 1b0b91a71886..95aba89eae88 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> @@ -57,13 +57,6 @@
> #define ACTMON_BELOW_WMARK_WINDOW 3
> #define ACTMON_BOOST_FREQ_STEP 16000
>
> -/*
> - * Activity counter is incremented every 256 memory transactions, and each
> - * transaction takes 4 EMC clocks for Tegra124; So the COUNT_WEIGHT is
> - * 4 * 256 = 1024.
> - */
> -#define ACTMON_COUNT_WEIGHT 0x400
> -
> /*
> * ACTMON_AVERAGE_WINDOW_LOG2: default value for @DEV_CTRL_K_VAL, which
> * translates to 2 ^ (K_VAL + 1). ex: 2 ^ (6 + 1) = 128
> @@ -111,7 +104,7 @@ enum tegra_actmon_device {
> MCCPU,
> };
>
> -static const struct tegra_devfreq_device_config actmon_device_configs[] = {
> +static const struct tegra_devfreq_device_config tegra124_device_configs[] = {
> {
> /* MCALL: All memory accesses (including from the CPUs) */
> .offset = 0x1c0,
> @@ -133,6 +126,28 @@ static const struct tegra_devfreq_device_config actmon_device_configs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static const struct tegra_devfreq_device_config tegra30_device_configs[] = {
> + {
> + /* MCALL: All memory accesses (including from the CPUs) */
> + .offset = 0x1c0,
> + .irq_mask = 1 << 26,
> + .boost_up_coeff = 200,
> + .boost_down_coeff = 50,
> + .boost_up_threshold = 20,
> + .boost_down_threshold = 10,
> + },
> + {
> + /* MCCPU: memory accesses from the CPUs */
> + .offset = 0x200,
> + .irq_mask = 1 << 25,
> + .boost_up_coeff = 800,
> + .boost_down_coeff = 40,
> + .boost_up_threshold = 27,
> + .boost_down_threshold = 10,
> + .avg_dependency_threshold = 16000, /* 16MHz in kHz units */
> + },
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct tegra_devfreq_device - state specific to an ACTMON device
> *
> @@ -155,6 +170,12 @@ struct tegra_devfreq_device {
> unsigned long target_freq;
> };
>
> +struct tegra_devfreq_soc_data {
> + const struct tegra_devfreq_device_config *configs;
> + /* Weight value for count measurements */
> + unsigned int count_weight;
> +};
> +
> struct tegra_devfreq {
> struct devfreq *devfreq;
> struct opp_table *opp_table;
> @@ -171,11 +192,13 @@ struct tegra_devfreq {
> struct delayed_work cpufreq_update_work;
> struct notifier_block cpu_rate_change_nb;
>
> - struct tegra_devfreq_device devices[ARRAY_SIZE(actmon_device_configs)];
> + struct tegra_devfreq_device devices[ARRAY_SIZE(tegra124_device_configs)];
When there is one tegra_devfreq_device_config[] array, this style is not wrong.
But, after adding the specific config array for each device,
you better specify the correct array size for each case.
Even if there is no runtime error on tegra30 soc, it is not proper to use
ARRAY_SIZE(tegra124_device_configs). You can allocate the array
of tegra_devfreq_device[] or use fixed the array size (2).
>
> unsigned int irq;
>
> bool started;
> +
> + const struct tegra_devfreq_soc_data *soc;
> };
>
> struct tegra_actmon_emc_ratio {
> @@ -488,7 +511,7 @@ static void tegra_actmon_configure_device(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
> tegra_devfreq_update_avg_wmark(tegra, dev);
> tegra_devfreq_update_wmark(tegra, dev);
>
> - device_writel(dev, ACTMON_COUNT_WEIGHT, ACTMON_DEV_COUNT_WEIGHT);
> + device_writel(dev, tegra->soc->count_weight, ACTMON_DEV_COUNT_WEIGHT);
> device_writel(dev, ACTMON_INTR_STATUS_CLEAR, ACTMON_DEV_INTR_STATUS);
>
> val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_ENB_PERIODIC;
> @@ -781,6 +804,8 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!tegra)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + tegra->soc = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +
> tegra->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(tegra->regs))
> return PTR_ERR(tegra->regs);
> @@ -858,9 +883,9 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> tegra->max_freq = rate / KHZ;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(actmon_device_configs); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra124_device_configs); i++) {
ditto. Use ARRARY_SIZE(soc->configs) instead of
ARRAY_SIZE(tegra124_device_configs).
> dev = tegra->devices + i;
> - dev->config = actmon_device_configs + i;
> + dev->config = tegra->soc->configs + i;
> dev->regs = tegra->regs + dev->config->offset;
> }
>
> @@ -925,9 +950,24 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct tegra_devfreq_soc_data tegra124_soc = {
> + .configs = tegra124_device_configs,
> +
> + /*
> + * Activity counter is incremented every 256 memory transactions,
> + * and each transaction takes 4 EMC clocks.
> + */
> + .count_weight = 4 * 256,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct tegra_devfreq_soc_data tegra30_soc = {
> + .configs = tegra30_device_configs,
> + .count_weight = 2 * 256,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id tegra_devfreq_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-actmon" },
> - { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-actmon" },
> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-actmon", .data = &tegra30_soc, },
> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-actmon", .data = &tegra124_soc, },
> { },
> };
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists