[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=r6oieZ-Nj-e6e+HriW8kADB75z2pj6W-gg7Cff3nqGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 22:33:27 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] .clang-format: Remove conditional comments
Hi Joe,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 7:29 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> Now that the clang minimum supported version is > 10.0, enable the
> commented out conditional reformatting key:value lines in the file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
>
> Hey Miguel.
>
> I don't use this, but on its face it seems a reasonable change
> if the commented out key:value lines are correct.
It is, yeah; however, the concern is that there may be developers
running an old clang-format from their distro (i.e. not using it for
compiling the kernel). We need to compare the functionality advantage
vs. the inconvenience of installing a current LLVM. The best would be
to ask whoever is using it right now, but there is no easy way to do
that -- many will only notice when the change is actually pushed :-)
So far, I have avoided upgrading the requirement until clang-format
could match the kernel style even better (i.e. so that when the
upgrade happens, there is a reason for it). Also, the configuration
can be overridden in subfolders, thus a maintainer can push things
forward in a subsystem meanwhile.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists